Consider the following statements about Lala Murlidhar :
(a) He practiced Law at Ambala.
(b) He attended the first session of Congress held at Bombay.
Which of the above statement/statements is/are true?

Question

Accepted Answer

Option 4 is the correct answer because both statements (a) and (b) about Lala Murlidhar are true. Here is a detailed explanation:

1. **Statement (a): He practiced Law at Ambala.**
   - Lala Murlidhar was indeed a practicing lawyer in Ambala. This is a well-documented fact about his professional life. His legal practice in Ambala is part of his historical background, which is recognized in various historical records and biographies. Therefore, statement (a) is true.

2. **Statement (b): He attended the first session of Congress held at Bombay.**
   - The first session of the Indian National Congress was held in Bombay (now Mumbai) in December 1885. Lala Murlidhar was among the attendees of this significant event. His participation in the first Congress session is a notable aspect of his involvement in the Indian independence movement. Thus, statement (b) is also true.

Given that both statements are accurate, Option 4, which states that both (a) and (b) are true, is the correct choice.

**Explanation of why other options are incorrect:**

- **Option 1: Only (a) is true.**
  - This option is incorrect because it disregards the truth of statement (b). As established, Lala Murlidhar did attend the first session of Congress in Bombay, making statement (b) true as well.

- **Option 2: Only (b) is true.**
  - This option is incorrect because it ignores the validity of statement (a). Lala Murlidhar's legal practice in Ambala is a verified fact, confirming that statement (a) is true.

- **Option 3: Neither (a) nor (b) is true.**
  - This option is incorrect because it falsely claims that both statements are untrue. As demonstrated, both statements (a) and (b) are factual and accurate.

In conclusion, the correct answer is Option 4, as both statements about Lala Murlidhar are true.