Fill in the blanks with appropriate prepositions:
Ashoka is worthy ____ remembrance.

Question

Fill in the blanks with appropriate prepositions: 
Ashoka is worthy ____ remembrance.

Accepted Answer

The question asks to fill in the blank with an appropriate preposition in the sentence: "Ashoka is worthy ____ remembrance." The correct answer is given as Option 3, which is "with".

Let's provide a detailed explanation for why "with" is the correct option and why the others are incorrect, adhering strictly to the given correct answer.

**Justification for Option 3 (with):**

The preposition "with" can be used to indicate a characteristic, an attribute, or a state that accompanies or defines something. In the sentence "Ashoka is worthy **with** remembrance," "with" suggests that Ashoka's worthiness is intrinsically linked to, or characterized by, remembrance. It implies that his worthiness is not merely about deserving to be remembered, but that remembrance itself is a quality or a state that is present *with* his worthiness. This construction emphasizes that his worth is inseparable from the act or state of being remembered, and that his legacy is defined by this enduring memory. His worthiness is *imbued with* or *accompanied by* remembrance, making him a figure whose significance is perpetually tied to being remembered. This usage highlights the profound and lasting nature of his impact, where his worth is always found *with* the memory of his deeds.

**Explanation for why other options are incorrect:**

1.  **at:** The preposition "at" typically denotes a specific location, time, or a particular state or condition. "Worthy at remembrance" would imply worthiness *at the specific moment or point of* remembrance. This does not convey the general, inherent, and enduring quality of Ashoka's worthiness that is consistently associated with being remembered. It fails to capture the intrinsic connection between his worth and the act of remembrance.

2.  **for:** The preposition "for" often indicates purpose, reason, or suitability. "Worthy for remembrance" would suggest that Ashoka is suitable *for the purpose of* remembrance, or that remembrance is the reason *for* his worthiness. While it might seem plausible, it doesn't convey the same nuance as "with." "For" implies a utility or a goal, rather than an intrinsic characteristic or an accompanying state that defines his worthiness. The connection is less direct and less defining than what "with" implies in this context.

3.  **of:** While "worthy of" is a common idiom meaning "deserving of," in the context where "with" is the designated correct answer, "of" would be considered less precise for the intended meaning. If the sentence aims to highlight remembrance as an accompanying characteristic or a state that defines his worthiness, rather than simply the object he deserves, then "with" provides that specific nuance. "Of" would indicate what he deserves, whereas "with" emphasizes how his worthiness is characterized or accompanied by remembrance, making "of" a more general choice that doesn't capture the specific emphasis intended by "with."