"Indira Sawhney and others Vs. Union of India" case is related to :

Question

Accepted Answer

The "Indira Sawhney and others Vs. Union of India" case, also known as the Mandal Commission case, is fundamentally related to the issue of OBC (Other Backward Classes) reservation, which is why Option 1 is the correct answer.

1. **Explanation for Option 1 (OBC reservation):**
   - The Indira Sawhney case, decided by the Supreme Court of India in 1992, addressed the implementation of recommendations made by the Mandal Commission. The Commission had recommended a 27% reservation for OBCs in central government jobs and educational institutions.
   - The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the reservation for OBCs, thereby affirming the government's decision to implement these recommendations. This landmark judgment also laid down the principle that the total reservation should not exceed 50%, ensuring a balance between affirmative action and meritocracy.
   - The case is significant because it clarified the scope and extent of reservations in India, particularly for OBCs, and set important precedents regarding the criteria for identifying backward classes.

2. **Explanation for why other options are incorrect:**

- **Option 2 (Abolition of reservation of scheduled caste):**
     - The Indira Sawhney case did not deal with the abolition of reservations for scheduled castes. Instead, it focused on the extension of reservations to OBCs. Reservations for scheduled castes were already established and were not challenged or abolished in this case.

- **Option 3 (Women protection):**
     - The case did not address issues related to the protection of women. It was centered around the reservation policy for socially and educationally backward classes, specifically OBCs, and did not involve any legal questions or rulings regarding women's protection.

- **Option 4 (Rights of working women):**
     - The rights of working women were not a subject of the Indira Sawhney case. The case was strictly about the reservation policy for OBCs and did not involve any discussions or judgments related to the rights or issues faced by working women.

In conclusion, the Indira Sawhney case is a pivotal legal decision concerning OBC reservation, making Option 1 the correct answer. The other options do not pertain to the issues addressed in this case.