Which of the following suggestions were not presented for the continuous and comprehensive evaluation of National Education Policy-1986?

Question

Accepted Answer

Option 4 is identified as the correct answer because it highlights a suggestion that was not presented for the continuous and comprehensive evaluation of the National Education Policy-1986. Let's delve into why this is the case and why the other options are incorrect.

1. **Explanation for Option 4:**
   - The statement "Intensive training is not needed in making of question papers" suggests a lack of emphasis on the importance of training educators in the development of assessment tools. The National Education Policy-1986 aimed to enhance the quality of education, which inherently includes the quality of assessments. Comprehensive evaluation requires well-constructed question papers that accurately measure student learning and understanding. Therefore, intensive training in creating these assessments is crucial to ensure they are effective and fair. The absence of this suggestion in the policy indicates that the policy did not overlook the importance of training, making Option 4 the correct choice as it was not a suggestion presented.

2. **Explanation for Option 1:**
   - "Evaluation should be aim-based" aligns with the objectives of the National Education Policy-1986, which sought to make education more relevant and goal-oriented. Aim-based evaluation ensures that assessments are aligned with educational goals and learning outcomes, making it a logical and necessary component of comprehensive evaluation.

3. **Explanation for Option 2:**
   - "Nature of evaluation should be vast" reflects the policy's intention to cover a broad spectrum of student abilities and learning outcomes. A vast evaluation approach ensures that various aspects of student development, including cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains, are assessed. This aligns with the policy's comprehensive nature, making it an appropriate suggestion.

4. **Explanation for Option 3:**
   - "Evaluation should be done regularly" is consistent with the policy's emphasis on continuous assessment. Regular evaluation helps in tracking student progress over time, providing timely feedback, and making necessary adjustments to teaching methods. This regularity is a cornerstone of continuous and comprehensive evaluation, making it a valid suggestion within the policy framework.

In summary, Option 4 is the correct answer because it represents a suggestion that was not part of the National Education Policy-1986's approach to continuous and comprehensive evaluation. The other options are incorrect as they align with the policy's objectives and strategies for improving educational assessment.