Which one of the following is not true of the role of grammar in language learning?

Question

Accepted Answer

The correct option is 1:
Grammar should be taught deductively followed by inductive application.

This statement is **not** true of the modern, effective role of grammar in language learning, making it the correct answer to the question. In current communicative language teaching (CLT) methodologies, the preferred approach is generally **inductive** or discovery learning, where students are presented with examples (contextual language use) first and are then guided to infer or "discover" the grammatical rule themselves. Following this, the deductive approach (starting with the rule) can be used to consolidate and clarify. The sequence presented in Option 1, which suggests starting with the deductive rule and *then* applying it inductively, misrepresents the common pedagogical principle, which prioritizes induction to foster deeper understanding and retention.

The incorrect option is 2:
Knowledge of grammar is a means and not an end in itself.
This statement is true. In modern pedagogy, grammar instruction is a *tool* (means) to achieve communicative competence, which is the ultimate *goal* (end).

The incorrect option is 3:
Unless absolutely necessary, grammatical terminology is to be avoided.
This statement is true. Overuse of complex metalanguage (like "present perfect continuous") can confuse younger or beginner learners. Modern teaching focuses on function and meaning over technical terms.

The incorrect option is 4:
Examples that support the rule are to be taught; exceptions are to be avoided.
This statement is true in pedagogical practice, especially at introductory levels. While exceptions are important for full proficiency, initially focusing solely on examples that perfectly demonstrate the rule prevents overload and confusion for students building a foundational understanding.