"Choose the part of sentence which is incorrect: $\frac{ ext{Has Sachin}}{(A)}$ / $\frac{ ext{not breaked}}{(B)}$ / $\frac{ ext{the record held}}{(C)}$ / $\frac{ ext{by Bradman who}}{(D)}$ made 10,000 runs in his career ?

Q: "Choose the part of sentence which is incorrect: $\frac{\text{Has Sachin}}{(A)}$ / $\frac{\text{not breaked}}{(B)}$ / $\frac{\text{the record held}}{(C)}$ / $\frac{\text{by Bradman who}}{(D)}$ made 10,000 runs in his career ?

The correct option is 2: This option, $\frac{\text{not breaked}}{(B)}$, contains a fundamental grammatical error related to irregular verbs and verb tenses, specifically the Present Perfect Tense. The sentence begins with the auxiliary verb "Has," indicating the necessity of the verb's Past Participle form (V3) to follow. The verb "break" is an irregular verb, and its principal parts are: Base form (V1) is 'break', Past Simple (V2) is 'broke', and the Past Participle (V3) is 'broken'. Since the sentence structure is interrogative Present Perfect, the correct form should be "Has Sachin not broken..." The word 'breaked' is an incorrect, non-existent form, as the verb does not follow the regular pattern of adding '-ed'. The incorrect option is 1: Option A, $\frac{\text{Has Sachin}}{(A)}$, is grammatically correct. "Has" is the appropriate auxiliary verb for the third-person singular subject "Sachin," and its placement at the start is correct for forming a negative interrogative sentence in the Present Perfect Tense. The incorrect option is 3: Option C, $\\frac{\\text{the record held}}{(C)}$, is correct. Here, "held" functions as a past participle modifying "record," indicating that the record was *previously* held by someone else (Bradman). This usage of 'held' is structurally sound and conveys the intended meaning within the clause. The incorrect option is 4: Option D, $\frac{\text{by Bradman who}}{(D)} \text{ made 10,000 runs in his career}$, is correct. This segment begins a relative clause using the pronoun "who" to correctly refer to the person (Bradman) who held the record. The Past Simple tense verb "made" is also correctly used here to describe a completed action in Bradman's career.

Question

Accepted Answer

The correct option is 2:

This option, $\frac{	ext{not breaked}}{(B)}$, contains a fundamental grammatical error related to irregular verbs and verb tenses, specifically the Present Perfect Tense. The sentence begins with the auxiliary verb "Has," indicating the necessity of the verb's Past Participle form (V3) to follow. The verb "break" is an irregular verb, and its principal parts are: Base form (V1) is 'break', Past Simple (V2) is 'broke', and the Past Participle (V3) is 'broken'. Since the sentence structure is interrogative Present Perfect, the correct form should be "Has Sachin not broken..." The word 'breaked' is an incorrect, non-existent form, as the verb does not follow the regular pattern of adding '-ed'.

The incorrect option is 1:

Option A, $\frac{	ext{Has Sachin}}{(A)}$, is grammatically correct. "Has" is the appropriate auxiliary verb for the third-person singular subject "Sachin," and its placement at the start is correct for forming a negative interrogative sentence in the Present Perfect Tense.

The incorrect option is 3:

Option C, $\frac{\text{the record held}}{(C)}$, is correct. Here, "held" functions as a past participle modifying "record," indicating that the record was *previously* held by someone else (Bradman). This usage of 'held' is structurally sound and conveys the intended meaning within the clause.

The incorrect option is 4:

Option D, $\frac{	ext{by Bradman who}}{(D)} 	ext{ made 10,000 runs in his career}$, is correct. This segment begins a relative clause using the pronoun "who" to correctly refer to the person (Bradman) who held the record. The Past Simple tense verb "made" is also correctly used here to describe a completed action in Bradman's career.