Out of the following which one is the wrong statement in context of characteristics of instincts ?

Question

Accepted Answer

Here's the explanation:

Option 3 is the wrong statement because instincts are NOT ephemeral. Ephemeral means lasting for a very short time. Instincts, by their very nature, are enduring and relatively permanent behavioral patterns. They are not fleeting or temporary. They are deeply ingrained and consistently influence behavior across an organism's lifespan (or at least a significant portion of it).

Here's why the other options are correct and therefore *not* the wrong statement:

*   **Option 1: Instinct is innate.** This is a core characteristic of instincts. Innate means present from birth and not learned. Instincts are genetically programmed behaviors, not acquired through experience.

*   **Option 2: Instinct is very powerful.** Instincts are indeed powerful motivators of behavior. They drive essential actions for survival and reproduction, often overriding learned behaviors or conscious decisions. The drive to eat, reproduce, or protect offspring are powerful examples.

*   **Option 4: Instinct is psycho-physical disposition.** This is also a correct statement. Instincts involve both psychological (mental urges, drives) and physical (bodily responses, physiological mechanisms) components. They are a complex interplay between the mind and body. The instinct to flee from danger, for example, involves both the psychological experience of fear and the physical response of increased heart rate and muscle tension.

Therefore, only Option 3 contradicts the established understanding of instincts, making it the wrong statement.