Project size is related with:

Question

Accepted Answer

The correct option is (1):
Technical feasibility is the primary dimension of a project feasibility study directly related to **project size** and complexity. This analysis assesses whether the project can be successfully developed and implemented with the organization's existing and acquirable technology, tools, hardware, software, and technical expertise. A larger project size inherently introduces greater technical challenges, such as increased resource requirements, more complex system architecture, and heightened scalability and integration issues. Technical feasibility is tasked with evaluating if the current technical capacity can effectively manage this increased scope, ensuring that the project's scale does not outstrip the available technological means.

The incorrect option is (2):
Economical feasibility, also known as financial feasibility, is concerned with the **cost-effectiveness and financial viability** of the project. Its main focus is on performing a cost-benefit analysis, determining the potential return on investment (ROI), and verifying that the project budget is justified by the expected benefits. While project size certainly influences the total cost, the *core* relationship is not size to feasibility, but rather **cost-to-benefit** and **return-to-risk**. A small project might be economically infeasible if its costs outweigh its benefits, and conversely, a large project might be entirely feasible if it offers a massive financial return.

The incorrect option is (3):
Organizational feasibility, often grouped with operational feasibility, evaluates whether the proposed solution can be **implemented, operated, and maintained effectively** within the organization's current structure, culture, and processes. It addresses questions of *usability*, *alignment* with strategic goals, and the impact on staff and workflows. This dimension is less concerned with the sheer technical scale of the software or system itself and more with the *people* and *process* readiness to adopt and utilize the new solution once it is delivered, regardless of how many lines of code it contains.

The incorrect option is (4):
Testing feasibility is **not a standard, standalone dimension** of a project feasibility study, which conventionally includes Technical, Economical, and Operational analysis. Testing is an *activity* or a *phase* within the project development lifecycle. While a larger project size certainly makes the testing effort more complex, time-consuming, and resource-intensive, the **testing effort** is typically scoped and evaluated as a component under **Technical feasibility** (resources, tools, expertise) and **Schedule feasibility** (timeline). It is not considered a primary, overarching feasibility assessment criterion in the same league as the others.