According to Von Thunen's Agricultural Land Use Theory, farmers followed the three-field system in :

Question

Accepted Answer

According to Von Thunen's Agricultural Land Use Theory, farmers followed the three-field system in **Zone V**.

Here's why:

*   **Zone V and the Three-Field System:** Von Thunen's model places land use in concentric rings around a central market. Zone V, being further from the market, represents land used for more extensive agriculture. The three-field system, a method of crop rotation where land is divided into three parts, one fallow, one planted with a spring crop, and one with a winter crop, is a less intensive farming practice than those closer to the market. This system allows for soil regeneration and reduces the need for fertilizers, making it suitable for areas where transportation costs to the market are higher and intensive farming is less profitable. The three-field system is a characteristic of less intensive, more extensive agriculture, which aligns with the characteristics of Zone V.

Here's why the other options are incorrect:

*   **Zone III:** Zone III, being closer to the market than Zone V, would be used for more intensive agriculture than the three-field system. This zone would likely be used for crops that require more labor and attention, and that can justify the higher transportation costs due to their value or perishability.
*   **Zone IV:** Zone IV is also closer to the market than Zone V. It would be used for agricultural activities that are more intensive than the three-field system, but less intensive than those in Zone III.
*   **Zone VI:** Zone VI is even further from the market than Zone V. While agriculture in Zone VI would be extensive, it would likely be even less intensive than the three-field system. This zone would be used for activities like ranching or forestry, where land is used extensively with minimal labor input.