Which of the following is NOT an effective strategy to address learners from disadvantaged and deprived backgrounds?

Question

Accepted Answer

Option 2 is the correct answer because it suggests a strategy that is not effective in addressing the needs of learners from disadvantaged and deprived backgrounds. Asking learners to enroll for tuition outside of school implies that the responsibility for their learning is shifted away from the school and the teacher. This approach can exacerbate the challenges faced by disadvantaged students, as they may not have the financial resources or access to additional tuition. It also neglects the teacher's role in providing equitable education and support within the school environment.

Now, let's examine why the other options are incorrect in the context of the question:

1. **Option 1: Talk to the learners to understand their needs and challenges faced by them.**
   - This option is incorrect as an ineffective strategy because understanding the specific needs and challenges of learners is crucial for providing targeted support. By engaging with students, teachers can tailor their teaching methods and resources to better assist those from disadvantaged backgrounds.

3. **Option 3: Motivate the students to set moderately challenging goals and provide appropriate instructional support.**
   - This option is incorrect as an ineffective strategy because setting achievable goals and offering instructional support can empower students and enhance their learning experience. It helps build their confidence and encourages them to strive for success, which is particularly important for students who may face additional barriers.

4. **Option 4: Form collaborative groups to work on activities and encourage students to support each other.**
   - This option is incorrect as an ineffective strategy because collaborative learning fosters a supportive classroom environment where students can learn from one another. It promotes peer support and can help bridge gaps in understanding, making it a valuable approach for students from diverse backgrounds.

In summary, Option 2 is the correct answer because it represents a strategy that fails to address the educational needs of disadvantaged learners effectively, while the other options provide supportive and inclusive approaches that can help mitigate the challenges these students face.