Which of the following statement is false ?

Question

Accepted Answer

Option 4 is identified as the correct answer, indicating that the statement "19 Mels are mentioned in Sangeet Ratnakar" is false. Here is a detailed explanation supporting this conclusion:

1. **Explanation for Option 4:**
   - The Sangeet Ratnakar, an ancient Indian musicological text written by Sharngadeva in the 13th century, does not mention 19 Mels. The concept of Melas, or parent scales, is more prominently associated with later musicological works, particularly in the Carnatic music tradition, where the 72 Melakarta system is well-known. The Sangeet Ratnakar primarily focuses on the musical theories and practices of its time, which did not include the specific enumeration of 19 Mels.

2. **Explanation for Option 1:**
   - The statement "15 Gamaks are mentioned in Sangeet Ratnakar" is true. The Sangeet Ratnakar is known for its detailed description of Gamaks, which are essential embellishments in Indian classical music. Sharngadeva's work categorizes and explains various types of Gamaks, and the number 15 is consistent with the descriptions found in the text.

3. **Explanation for Option 2:**
   - The statement "6 Kakus are mentioned in Sangeet Ratnakar" is true. Kakus refer to variations in vocal intonation and expression, and the Sangeet Ratnakar includes a discussion of different types of Kakus. The number 6 aligns with the traditional understanding of these variations as described in the text.

4. **Explanation for Option 3:**
   - The statement "12 Vikrit Swara are mentioned in Sangeet Ratnakar" is true. Vikrit Swaras are altered notes, and the Sangeet Ratnakar provides an account of these in the context of its musical framework. The number 12 is consistent with the traditional enumeration of Vikrit Swaras in the text.

In summary, Option 4 is correctly identified as the false statement because the Sangeet Ratnakar does not mention 19 Mels, whereas the other options accurately reflect the content of the text.