Who stated that "An individual is intelligent in proportion as he is able to carry on abstract thinking" ?

Question

Accepted Answer

Option 1, Terman, is the correct answer to the question, "Who stated that 'An individual is intelligent in proportion as he is able to carry on abstract thinking'?" This statement is attributed to Lewis Terman, an American psychologist who is best known for his work in educational psychology and the development of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales. Terman's work focused on the measurement of intelligence and the importance of abstract thinking as a key component of intellectual ability. His emphasis on abstract thinking aligns with the statement in the question, as he believed that the capacity for abstract reasoning was a crucial indicator of intelligence.

Now, let's examine why the other options are incorrect:

2. Dearborn: Walter F. Dearborn was an American psychologist known for his research in the field of educational psychology, particularly in reading and learning disabilities. While he made significant contributions to understanding learning processes, there is no record of him making the specific statement about intelligence and abstract thinking attributed to Terman.

3. Buckingham: B. R. Buckingham was an educational psychologist known for his work in educational measurement and evaluation. Although he contributed to the field of educational psychology, there is no evidence that he made the statement in question regarding intelligence and abstract thinking.

4. Calvin: This option likely refers to John Calvin, a theologian and a key figure in the Protestant Reformation, rather than a psychologist. Calvin's work focused on religious and theological matters, not on psychological theories of intelligence. Therefore, he would not have made a statement about intelligence and abstract thinking in the context of psychological research.

In conclusion, Option 1, Terman, is the correct answer because he is the psychologist who emphasized the role of abstract thinking in intelligence, aligning with the statement provided in the question. The other options do not have any known association with this specific statement about intelligence.